Optimizing the Aging Brain? Situating Ethical Aspects of Dementia Prevention (BEAD)

[Status: Completed]

This project explores the ethical, social, and epistemological dimensions of emerging dementia prevention strategies across Germany, Canada, and Switzerland. Using an interdisciplinary, qualitative methodology, including stakeholder interviews, discourse analysis, and focused clinical and community ethnographies, it critically examines how prevention is shaped by structural, cultural, and technological factors. The goal is to develop a context-sensitive framework for ethical, social, and policy aspects and to inform an understanding of dementia prevention beyond purely medical models.

Project Team
Alessandro Blasimme
Mattia Andreoletti

 

Description
The emphasis of this project lies on understanding dementia prevention as a complex issue that must be addressed in a context-sensitive way. Not all risks can be attributed as solely the responsibility of the individual nor as a scientific problem, as it can be seen from risk factors such as educational inequality and social isolation. As a consequence, the analysis of risk factors might be less successful or even useless if structural factors are not taken into consideration. It becomes clear from this that dementia prevention must encompass the views of a wide range of people, not just a few experts – such as ethicists and natural scientists –, but also people involved with patient groups, political institutions, insurance agencies, etc. Therefore, we decided to adopt a comparative, qualitative empirical stakeholder interview study including scientists, technologists and public stakeholders. In addition, we carry out a comparative discourse analysis of significant public and policy documents to complement our findings (e.g., media coverage, policy guidelines). Moreover, we seek to unravel the situatedness of prevention-related factors in a hitherto predominantly medical understanding of dementia by conducting in-depth ethnographic research in a variety of settings.

It is also clear that new developments in medicine and technology, such as early diagnosis and the improvement of medical treatment, can have an impact on preventive measures and lifestyle choices taken by individuals. Therefore, reactions to these measures can vary depending on personal circumstances and socio-cultural environments. Such new technologies of “self-optimization” – that are predicted to play a key role in the new dementia – are also distributed, accepted and integrated differently in different national contexts. We believe that related ethical issues are also highly context-dependent, an often-neglected perspective in bioethics.

Our objective is to provide a nuanced and empirically informed analysis of dementia prevention. In order to achieve this, the project’s methodology follows a combination of approaches that in its complementarity should not only map the current changes, but also critically appraise present understandings of dementia prevention. The project, therefore, works on:

  1. a comparative, qualitative empirical stakeholder interview study including scientists, technologists and public stakeholders
  2. a comparative discourse analysis of significant public and policy documents (e.g., media coverage, policy guidelines),
  3. focused ethnographies that capture perspectives from everyday clinical and community life,
  4. an integrative analysis of the epistemological, ethical, and social implications,
  5. use of interdisciplinary methodologies (discourse analysis, ethnography, expert interviews from the perspectives of (bio-)ethics, medical anthropology, and philosophy) to develop a framework for ethical, social and policy aspects,
  6. tailored knowledge translations for different stakeholders (the lay public, public stakeholders) for increasing understanding of the new dementia prevention.

Andreoletti, M., Lazzaroni, C., Petersen, N., Segawa, S., Leibing, A., Schicktanz, S., & Blasimme, A. (2023). Optimizing the aging brain: The BEAD study on the ethics of dementia prevention. The Journal of Frailty & Aging, 12(2), 111-116.

Mattia, A., & Blasimme, A. (2023). From research to policy: unveiling dementia prevention efforts in Switzerland. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1-21.

Blasimme, A. (2022). The ethics of geriatric care. Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine, 2, 1459-1465.

Blasimme, A., Boniolo, G., & Nathan, M. J. (2021). Rethinking ageing: introduction. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(3), 95.

Blasimme, A., Canevelli, M., & Cesari, M. (2021). Shifting the focus of dementia prevention: ethical considerations. AJOB neuroscience, 12(4), 240-242.

Blasimme, A. (2020). Mind’s Frailty: Elements of a" Geriatric Logic" in the Clinical Discourse about Dementia Prevention. In Preventing dementia? Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age (pp. 110-128). Berghahn.

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser